|
Post by healthy11 on Nov 17, 2014 23:12:41 GMT -5
I wonder if those of us who have children that don't spell well are better able to decipher the following paragraph? The person who forwarded it to me claims that only 55 people out of 100 can interpret it:
I cdnuolt blveiee that I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd what I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr in what oerdr the ltteres in a word are, the olny iproamtnt tihng is that the frsit and last ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raed it whotuit a pboerlm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the word as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? Yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!
|
|
|
Post by hsmom on Nov 18, 2014 17:36:28 GMT -5
This paragraph went around among my friends on Facebook. Most could read it whether or not they had children who are dyslexic and don't spell well.
|
|